Linson v. Linson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “federal law does not bar Ha waii family courts from considering and dividing husband’s nonvested military retirement benefits as part of the estate of the parties under HRS § 580-47”
• holding that the marital estate includes \anything of present or prospective value\
• construing the term “estate of the parties” to include anything of present or prospective value
• construing the term \estate of the parties\ to include anything of present or prospective value
• \estate of the parties\ as used in § 580-47 includes anything of present or prospective value, including nonvested retirement benefits, for just and equitable division of property
• \estate of the parties\ as used in § 580-47 includes anything of present or prospective value, including nonvested retirement benefits, for just and equitable division of property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).