Skip to main content
· 5/19/1998

Kuroda v. Kuroda

Citations

  • 958 P.2d 541
  • 87 Haw. 419
  • 1998 Haw. App. LEXIS 91

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “a motion in limine is not an authorized method for presenting issues involving genuine issues of fact (in contrast to stipulated facts, questions of law, and matters of discretion) to the court for decision”
  • discussing the appropriate purpose of a motion in limine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, Watanábe, Kirimitsu

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.