Skip to main content

Linrud v. Linrud

Citations

  • 552 N.W.2d 342
  • 1996 N.D. LEXIS 181
  • 1996 WL 401562

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that preserving the viability of business operations, such as a farm, “does not call for a windfall for one spouse.”
  • “The goal of preserving a [farming] business, however, does not call for a windfall for one spouse.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sandstrom, Vande Walle, Neumann, Maring, Meschke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Linrud v. Linrud

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.