North Dakota Supreme Court· 7/18/1996
Linrud v. Linrud
Citations
- 552 N.W.2d 342
- 1996 N.D. LEXIS 181
- 1996 WL 401562
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that preserving the viability of business operations, such as a farm, “does not call for a windfall for one spouse.”
- “The goal of preserving a [farming] business, however, does not call for a windfall for one spouse.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sandstrom, Vande Walle, Neumann, Maring, Meschke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hoverson v. HoversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-07-10· cited 55×
- Zuger v. ZugerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-05-23· cited 54×
- Dronen v. DronenNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 52×
- Mosbrucker v. MosbruckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-04-22· cited 49×
- Anderson v. A.P.I. Co. of MinnesotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 45×
- Ackerman v. AckermanNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-07-13· cited 41×
- Mellum v. MellumNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-03-21· cited 40×
- Kluck v. KluckNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-03-20· cited 39×
- Dvorak v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-07-27· cited 39×
- Richter v. HouserNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-07-29· cited 38×
- Schoenwald v. SchoenwaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-05-19· cited 33×
- Hagel v. HagelNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-08-21· cited 33×
- Marschner v. MarschnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-04-25· cited 33×
- Barth v. BarthNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-05-19· cited 31×
- Fisher v. FisherNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-09-08· cited 28×
- Gibbon v. GibbonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-11-06· cited 28×
- Holden v. HoldenNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-02-28· cited 28×
- Eberle v. EberleNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2010-06-10· cited 27×
- McCarthy v. McCarthyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-12-18· cited 26×
- Linrud v. LinrudNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-03-05· cited 22×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Nicholas Acoustics & Specialty Company v. H & M Construction Company, Inc. And Insurance Company of North AmericaFifth Circuit· 1983-01-17· cited 95×
- Van Oosting v. Van OostingNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-09-07· cited 85×
- Heley v. HeleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1993-09-29· cited 84×
- State v. AshNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1995-01-19· cited 52×
- Fenske v. FenskeNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-01-11· cited 46×
- Gaulrapp v. GaulrappNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-01-05· cited 31×
- McDonough v. MurphyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1995-10-31· cited 30×
- Tuff v. TuffNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-04-14· cited 29×
- Bergquist-Walker Real Estate, Inc. v. William Clairmont, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1983-04-14· cited 26×
- Olson v. Griggs CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1992-11-05· cited 23×
- In the Interest of K.E.N. ex rel. Shasky v. R.C.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-03-30· cited 20×
- Schatke v. SchatkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-08-24· cited 16×
- Bell v. BellNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1995-12-04· cited 16×
- Hobus v. HobusNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1995-11-30· cited 12×
- Irgens v. Mobil Oil Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-06-06· cited 10×
- Wood v. KrenzNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-08-20· cited 9×
- Dorgan v. MercilNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1977-07-27· cited 3×
Other cases named Linrud v. Linrud
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.