Skip to main content
· 9/29/1993

Heley v. Heley

Citations

  • 506 N.W.2d 715
  • 1993 N.D. LEXIS 176
  • 1993 WL 381078

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding premarital assets which have been commingled and no longer have any separate identity should be included in the marital estate
  • support appropriate until spouse is rehabilitated and “possibly at a reduced rate for an indefinite term”
  • support appropriate until spouse is rehabilitated and \possibly at a reduced rate for an indefinite term\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neumann, Vande Walle, Levine, Sandstrom, Meschke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.