Lindsay v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Nevada follows the rule of exclusion concerning evidence of other offenses, unless such evidence is relevant to prove the commission of the crime charged with respect to motive, intent, identity, the absence of mistake or accident, or a common scheme or plan.” (footnotes omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bigpond v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2012-03-01· cited 73×
• Jacobs v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1975-03-13· cited 34×
• Hill v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1979-05-09· cited 20×
• Elsbury v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1974-01-31· cited 16×
• Cirillo v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1980-06-04· cited 13×
• Richardson v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1975-04-30· cited 7×
• Tigner v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1972-05-02· cited 1×