Radio Steel & Mfg. Co. v. MTD Products Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the common use of \Chiro-\ in third-party marks weakened the distinctiveness of the applicant's CHIRO-MATIC mark
• denying claim of family of CHIRO- formative marks, while also noting the inherent weakness of CHIRO and that “[t]he evidence further establishes that the term CHIRO has been commonly used and/or registered by third parties”
• “One who opposes registration to an applicant under Section 2(d
• “One who opposes registration to an applicant under Section 2(d
• CHIROPRACTIC and CHIRO-MATIC not confusingly similar

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).