Skip to main content
· 11/23/1988

Lienhard v. State

Citations

  • 431 N.W.2d 861
  • 1988 Minn. LEXIS 278
  • 1988 WL 123768

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding in dictum that prejudgment interest “con-vertís] time-of-demand damages into time-of-verdict damages”
  • distinguishing prejudgment interest, which is “directly proportional to the magnitude of damages sustained by the claimant,” from costs and disbursements, which “are not part of the claim for compensation of personal injury”
  • prejudgment Merest is an element of damages
  • prejudgment interest is an element of damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coyne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.