· 11/23/1988
Lienhard v. State
Citations
- 431 N.W.2d 861
- 1988 Minn. LEXIS 278
- 1988 WL 123768
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding in dictum that prejudgment interest “con-vertís] time-of-demand damages into time-of-verdict damages”
- distinguishing prejudgment interest, which is “directly proportional to the magnitude of damages sustained by the claimant,” from costs and disbursements, which “are not part of the claim for compensation of personal injury”
- prejudgment Merest is an element of damages
- prejudgment interest is an element of damages
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coyne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.