· 7/14/1989
Hubred v. Control Data Corp.
Citations
- 442 N.W.2d 308
- 1989 Minn. LEXIS 173
- 1989 WL 75902
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming district court’s ruling on summary judgment that doctrine of reasonable expectations was inapplicable where no facts or circumstances justified a reasonable expectation of coverage
- “The fact that the ... [insureds] were not orally informed of the exclusion does not, standing alone, free them of the responsibility of having read the exclusion at least as it appeared in the ...' [policy].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.