Skip to main content
· 7/14/1989

Hubred v. Control Data Corp.

Citations

  • 442 N.W.2d 308
  • 1989 Minn. LEXIS 173
  • 1989 WL 75902

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming district court’s ruling on summary judgment that doctrine of reasonable expectations was inapplicable where no facts or circumstances justified a reasonable expectation of coverage
  • “The fact that the ... [insureds] were not orally informed of the exclusion does not, standing alone, free them of the responsibility of having read the exclusion at least as it appeared in the ...' [policy].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.