Skip to main content

Lewis v. State

Citations

  • 831 S.E.2d 771

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the appellant’s “challenge to the aggravated assault conviction [wa]s moot because that count” had merged with the felony murder count
  • holding that the evidence, including a positive DNA match, was sufficient despite the defendant’s hypothetical argument that he did not rape the victim
  • tolling applies where “the State has not obtained sufficient information to establish probable cause to arrest a particular suspect”
  • “The person-unknown exception applies if the [s]tate has not obtained sufficient information to establish probable cause to arrest a particular suspect.”
  • evidence which included that vic- tim’s body was discovered partially undressed, had defensive wounds, and had defendant’s sperm in her vagina was sufficient to sustain his convictions for murder and rape, and authorized jury to reject his alternate hypothesis as unreasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.