Skip to main content
First Circuit· 3/17/1994

Lewis v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 18 F.3d 20
  • 73 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1462
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 4779
  • 1994 WL 73914

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding irreparable harm in part because “the right to continue a 19 business ‘is not measurable entirely in monetary terms’” (quoting Semmes Motors, Inc. v. Ford 20 Motor Co., 429 F.2d 1197, 1205 (2d Cir. 1970))
  • rejecting argument that “notice must actually be received to provide 25 an opportunity to opt out for purposes of due process,” and holding that “the appropriate standard 26 is the best notice practicable”
  • “Conclusory allegations which are not supported by a statement of 19 specific facts do not warrant habeas relief.”
  • defendant's guilty plea was not involuntary despite claims 26 8 27 1 plea was induced by stress and defendant's difficulty being separated from his family 2 during pretrial detention
  • \[T]he misstatement must be one on which the government reasonably relied.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breyer, Rosenn, Cyr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.