Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 3/1/1904

Lewis v. Clark

Citations

  • 129 F. 570
  • 64 C.C.A. 138
  • 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4072

Syllabus

<p>1. Building and Loan Associations — Insolvency—Foreclosure Suit by Foreign Receiver.</p> <p>A building and loan association of Minnesota deposited bonds and mortgages of its members with the state of Wisconsin, in compliance with the law of that state, in order to entitle it to do business therein, and to secure the performance of contracts made with citizens of the state. The association having become insolvent, a controversy arose in the courts of Wisconsin between a special receiver there appointed and the general receiver in Minnesota as to the right to such securities, pending which, however, it was stipulated that they should be collected by the Wisconsin receiver, and they were formally assigned to him by the general receiver. Reid, that a federal court in Idaho, acting in a spirit of comity, properly permitted such receiver to maintain a suit therein to foreclose a mortgage given by a citizen of the state on property therein which constituted one of the securities so deposited, although he was not entitled to maintain such suit as a matter of right; it not being contrary to any law or public policy of the state, nor in any manner prejudicial to any right of the defendants.</p> <p>2. Same — Contracts with Borrowing Members — Effect of Insolvency.</p> <p>The insolvency of a building and loan association works a rescission of its contracts with its members, and sums borrowed by them become immediately due and payable, regardless of the terms of payment fixed by the contract.</p> <p>3. Same — Usury—Law Governing.</p> <p>A bond and mortgage given by a member to a building and loan association organized under the laws of Minnesota, payable at its office in that state, are governed by its laws with respect to usury, although the mortgaged property may be situated in another state, where the borrower resides.</p> <p>1[ 1. Suits by and against receivers of federal courts, see note to J. I. Case Plow Works v. Finks, 26 C. C. A. 49.</p> <p>IT 3. What law governs usu

Judges: Hawley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.