Reynolds v. Adden
Citations
- 136 U.S. 348
- 10 S. Ct. 843
- 34 L. Ed. 360
- 1890 U.S. LEXIS 2218
Syllabus
<p>■3. H. A. resides in Reading in Massachusetts. J. A., his father, who had formerly resided there, removed to Lancaster in New Hampshire, of which he has since been a resident. The son becoming insolvent, the father became surety for one of his assignees, and for that purpose signed a bond in which he was described as of Reading; Held, that, no one being prejudiced thereby, this did not estop the father in a suit in Louisiana between him and the assignee, involving a claim to property of the insolvent there, from showing that he was not a citizen of Massachusetts, but a citizen of New Hampshire.</p> <p>In Louisiana a transfer of the estate of an insolvent debtor by judicial operation is not binding upon the citizens and inhabitants of Louisiana, or of any other State except the State in which the insolvent proceedings have tafeen place — at least until the legal assignee has reduced the property 'to possession, or done what is equivalent thereto.</p>
Judges: Bradley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bradford Electric Light Co. v. ClapperSupreme Court· 1932-05-16· cited 186×
- Moran v. SturgesSupreme Court· 1894-05-26· cited 177×
- Clark v. WilliardSupreme Court· 1934-04-02· cited 115×
- Seaboard Finance Company v. DavisN.D. Illinois· 1967-11-17· cited 30×
- Bradford Elec. Light Co. v. ClapperSupreme Court· 1932-05-16· cited 29×
- Zacher v. Fidelity Trust & Safety-Vault Co.Sixth Circuit· 1901-01-08· cited 14×
- Scarf v. AldrichCalifornia Supreme Court· 1893-02-18· cited 13×
- In Re Estate of Dorothy H. Burrough, Deceased. Ann Burrough (Donovan) Cennamo v. American Security & Trust CompanyD.C. Circuit· 1973-02-23· cited 10×
- Walls v. AhmedE.D. Pennsylvania· 1993-09-24· cited 10×
- Bank v. Motherwell Iron, etc., Co.Tennessee Supreme Court· 1895-06-17· cited 9×
- Rudenberg v. ClarkD. Massachusetts· 1947-06-24· cited 8×
- McGee v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.First Circuit· 1931-11-28· cited 6×
- Southern Ry. Co. v. PainterEighth Circuit· 1941-01-10· cited 6×
- Michelson v. Exxon Research and Engineering Co.W.D. Pennsylvania· 1984-01-18· cited 5×
- Davidson v. Montana-Dakota Power Co.D. North Dakota· 1927-11-07· cited 5×
- Lewis v. ClarkNinth Circuit· 1904-03-01· cited 5×
- Schindelholz v. CullumEighth Circuit· 1893-05-01· cited 5×
- Messersmith v. MatteucciE.D. California· 1966-10-11· cited 3×
- State Ex Rel. School District No. 40 v. WaldenSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1933-11-28· cited 2×
- Illinois Life Ins. v. ShenehonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin· 1901-07-20· cited 1×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.