Skip to main content
· 8/27/1986

Lewis v. Bell

Citations

  • 724 P.2d 425
  • 45 Wash. App. 192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • this court will not disturb a decision denying a continuance absent manifest abuse of discretion
  • denial of continuance request not abuse of discretion where no explanation given for not obtaining deposition during 16-month pendency of action
  • this court will not disturb a decision denying a continuance absent manifest abuse of discretion
  • “A pleading is insufficient when it does not give the opposing party fair notice of what the claim is and the ground upon which it rests.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.