· 8/27/1986
Lewis v. Bell
Citations
- 724 P.2d 425
- 45 Wash. App. 192
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- this court will not disturb a decision denying a continuance absent manifest abuse of discretion
- denial of continuance request not abuse of discretion where no explanation given for not obtaining deposition during 16-month pendency of action
- this court will not disturb a decision denying a continuance absent manifest abuse of discretion
- “A pleading is insufficient when it does not give the opposing party fair notice of what the claim is and the ground upon which it rests.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.