Levinson v. Levinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that attorney fees awarded pursuant to NRS 125.040 contemplate prospective expenses and should not reflect the attorneys' work already performed or expenses already incurred
• \That an order for allowances under [NRS 125.0401 must operate prospectively has been well established in this state. Expenses incurred and attorneys' services performed in the past are not proper considerations.\
• \That an order for allowances under [NRS 125.0401 must operate prospectively has been well established in this state. Expenses incurred and attorneys' services performed in the past are not proper considerations.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gumm v. Mainor
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2002-12-26· cited 55×
• Martin v. Martin
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2022-12-01· cited 11×
• GRIFFITH VS. GONZALES-ALPIZAR
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2016-05-26

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wilde v. Wilde
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1866-07-01· cited 18×
• Fleming v. Fleming
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1937-11-05· cited 17×
• Wilkinson v. Wilkinson
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1957-05-21· cited 10×
• Engebretson v. Engebretson
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1957-02-11· cited 7×
• Hannah v. Hannah
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1936-12-01· cited 4×