Fleming v. Fleming

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, with regard to the 1929 equivalent of NRS 125.040, a divorce action remains pending after the entry of a divorce decree for some purposes, such as modifications to child custody
• stating that, with regard to the 1929 equivalent of NRS 125.040, a divorce action remains pending after the entry of a divorce decree for some purposes, such as modifications to child custody

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Heard v. Heard
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1948-11-03· cited 40×
• Folks v. Folks
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1961-02-08· cited 15×
• Anderson v. Anderson
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1951-07-16· cited 13×
• Peri v. Groves
  New York Supreme Court· 1944-06-07· cited 5×
• Levinson v. Levinson
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1958-05-22· cited 5×
• Foutch v. Foutch
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1970-04-20· cited 2×
• Riemer v. Riemer
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1956-10-22· cited 2×
• Engebretson v. Engebretson
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1959-04-28· cited 1×
• GRIFFITH VS. GONZALES-ALPIZAR
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2016-05-26

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Spratt v. Spratt
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1921-12-09· cited 37×
• Vilas v. Vilas
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1931-10-12· cited 24×
• Bradstreet v. Bradstreet
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1928-11-13· cited 23×
• Hipple v. Hipple
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1929-06-08· cited 20×
• Wilde v. Wilde
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1866-07-01· cited 18×
• Effinger v. Effinger
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1924-09-10· cited 14×
• Buehler v. Buehler
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1915-07-15· cited 13×
• Black v. Black
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1924-01-05· cited 9×
• Smith v. Smith
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1910-12-05· cited 7×