Leung v. Nunes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The plaintiff’s choice, however, is not an absolute and uncontrolled privilege that is determinative under present forum non conveniens law.”
• “The plaintiff’s choice, however, is not an absolute and uncontrolled privilege that is determinative under present forum non conveniens law.”
• “Unless the balance of convenience is strongly in favor of the defendant, or such balance weighs heavily in favor of the defendant, the plaintiffs choice of forum should not, or should rarely, be disturbed.” (internal quotations omitted)
• “Commentators on Rule 2-327(c) have recognized that ‘due consideration must ... be given to the plaintiff’s selection of forum, and this selection will not be altered solely because it is more convenient for the party moving to be in another forum.’ ”
• ‘Commentators on Rule 2-327(c) have recognized that “due consideration must ... be given to the plaintiffs selection of forum, and this selection will not be altered solely because it is more convenient for the party moving to be in another forum.” ’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brewster v. Woodhaven Building & Development, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-08-22· cited 43×
• Jones v. Prince George's County
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-11-13· cited 23×
• Cobrand v. Adventist Healthcare, Inc.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-02-05· cited 22×
• Thompson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-12-02· cited 20×
• Stidham v. Morris
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-04-01· cited 14×
• Nodeen v. Sigurdsson
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-04-07· cited 14×
• Sigurdsson v. Nodeen
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-06-26· cited 9×
• University of Maryland Medical System Corp. v. Kerrigan
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-11-28· cited 6×
• Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-06-07· cited 6×
• Murray v. Transcare Maryland, Inc.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-02-09· cited 6×
• Nace v. Miller
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-09-07· cited 5×
• Smith v. Johns Hopkins Community Physicians, Inc.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-01-23· cited 5×
• Bittner v. Huth
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-06-21· cited 4×
• Volkman v. Hanover Investment, Inc.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-11-25· cited 4×
• Scott v. Hawit
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-05-03· cited 3×
• Dinapoli v. Kent Island, LLC
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-03-01· cited 2×
• Univ. of MD Med. System v. Kerrigan
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-11-28
• HBC US Propco v. Fed. Realty Inv. Trust
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2023-09-01

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno
  Supreme Court· 1982-01-25· cited 4,581×
• Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-20· cited 3,025×
• Ford Motor Co. v. Ryan. Ferguson v. Ford Motor Co.
  Second Circuit· 1950-05-08· cited 265×
• In the Matter of Emanuel Josephson
  First Circuit· 1954-12-23· cited 230×
• Filmline (Cross-Country) Productions, Inc. And Yellowbill Finance Limited v. United Artists Corporation
  Second Circuit· 1989-01-12· cited 182×
• Unnamed case
  Second Circuit· 1966-08-08· cited 135×
• Magnetic Engineering & Manufacturing Co. v. Dings Mfg. Co.
  Second Circuit· 1950-01-04· cited 129×
• Southern Railway Company, a Corporation v. Frank J. Madden
  Fourth Circuit· 1956-08-04· cited 88×
• Headrick v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.
  Tenth Circuit· 1950-05-08· cited 71×
• Odenton Development Company v. Lamy
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-07-02· cited 49×
• Seagoing Uniform Corp. v. Texaco, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1989-01-24· cited 49×
• Doering v. Fader
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-06-08· cited 37×
• Pittsburgh Corning Corp. v. James
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-04-23· cited 35×
• Barr Laboratories, Inc. v. Quantum Pharmics, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 1993-07-07· cited 32×
• Doe v. Connors
  W.D. Virginia· 1992-03-17· cited 29×
• Whittier v. Emmet
  D.C. Circuit· 1960-06-23· cited 29×
• Urquhart v. Simmons
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-06-26· cited 26×
• Keene Corp. v. Levin
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-04-28· cited 18×
• Kimball v. Schwartz
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1984-02-13· cited 17×
• Gdovin v. Catawba Rental Co., Inc.
  N.D. Ohio· 1984-10-19· cited 15×