Cobrand v. Adventist Healthcare, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The plaintiffs choice ... is not an absolute and uncontrolled privilege that is determinative under present forum nan conveniens law.”
• “Because appellants challenge the grant of appellee’s motion [to transfer], this case is properly before us on appeal.”
• “To simply call it a balancing test ... is in some regards ... misleading because [our decisions] make it clear that ‘a motion to transfer should only be granted when the balance weighs strongly in favor of the moving party.”’
• ‘To simply call it a balancing test ... is in some regards ... misleading because [our decisions] make it clear that “a motion to transfer should only be granted when the balance weighs strongly in favor of the moving party.” ’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).