Lester Russell v. Wallace Bartley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to find a private right of action on behalf of employees injured by OSHA safety violations because § 4 of the Act evinces a contrary legislative intent
• declining to find a private right of action on behalf of employees injured by OSHA safety violations because § 4 of the Act evinces a contrary legislative intent
• \[T]here is no legislative history or case law to support [the] proposition that OSHA created a private civil remedy and the clear language of [29 U.S.C.A.] § 653(b)(4). . . specifically evidences a congressional intention to the contrary\
• OSHA does not create a private civil remedy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).