Koll v. Manatt's Transportation Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that OSHA standards are appropriate for employees and nonemployees when applying negligence per se
• holding that OSHA standards are appropriate for employees and nonemployees when applying negligence per se
• ruling that a violation of an OSHA regulation by an employer is negligence per se as to his employee without discussing the effect of the state statute equivalent to 29 U.S.C. § 653(b)(4)
• ruling that a violation of an OSHA regulation by an employer is negligence per se as to his employee without discussing the effect of the state statute equivalent to 29 U.S.C. § 653(b)(4)
• negligence action maintainable for employer’s violation of standard of care imposed by OSHA or IOSHA
• employer’s violation of OSHA or IOSHA standards is negligence per se as to employees and evidence of negligence as to all likely to be exposed to the danger

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).