Leshinsky v. Telvent GIT, S.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to rely on Senate Report because clarification language was not included in the text of the statute
• \congressional enactments and administrative rules will not be construed to have retroactive effect unless their language requires this result.\
• giving Mead deference to an ARB interpretation of Section 806
• collecting cases and reaching same conclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Leshinsky v. Telvent GIT, S.A.
  S.D. New York· 2013-05-01· cited 22×
• SRM Global Master Fund Ltd. Partnership v. Bear Stearns Companies LLC
  S.D. New York· 2014-02-05· cited 22×
• Ashmore v. CGI Group Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2015-09-23· cited 15×
• Ahmad v. Morgan Stanley & Co.
  S.D. New York· 2014-02-21· cited 10×
• Yang v. Navigators Group, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2014-05-08· cited 10×
• Wiest v. Lynch
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2014-04-16· cited 2×
• Mart v. Gozdecki, Del Giudice, Americus & Farkas LLP
  N.D. Illinois· 2012-11-16· cited 2×
• Commissioner of Public Health v. Freedom of Information Commission
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-03-25