District of Columbia· 5/14/2015
Leopold v. Central Intelligence Agency
Citations
- 106 F. Supp. 3d 51
- 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63014
- 2015 WL 2255957
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a document need only satisfy \one category\ to meet § 1.4's classification requirement
- holding that a document need only satisfy “one category” to meet § 1.4’s classification requirement
- holding that disclosure of CIA expenditures “could shed light on the funds that were available for particular activities, which could, in turn, divulge the agency’s capabilities and priorities”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge James E. Boasberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Associated Press v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationD.C. Circuit· 2017-09-30· cited 13×
- Leopold v. Cent. Intelligence AgencyD.C. Circuit· 2019-03-29· cited 10×
- Cable News Network, Inc. v. Fed. Bureau of InvestigationD.C. Circuit· 2019-06-07· cited 9×
- Competitive Enter. Inst. v. Dep't of TreasuryD.C. Circuit· 2018-08-09· cited 8×
- Associated Press v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict of Columbia· 2017-09-30
- Electronic Privacy Information Center v. Office of the Director of National IntelligenceDistrict of Columbia· 2017-12-18
- Competitive Enterprise Institute v. United States Department of the TreasuryDistrict of Columbia· 2018-08-09
- Leopold v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict of Columbia· 2019-03-29
- Smith v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict of Columbia· 2019-08-20
- Khatchadourian v. Defense Intelligence AgencyDistrict of Columbia· 2020-03-19
- James Madison Project v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict of Columbia· 2020-09-23
- Khatchadourian v. Defense Intelligence AgencyDistrict of Columbia· 2022-03-31
- Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in WashingtonDistrict of Columbia· 2022-09-30
- Brown v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict of Columbia· 2023-08-18
- Wp Company LLC v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict of Columbia· 2024-03-07
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court· 2007-04-30· cited 13,305×
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court· 1989-03-22· cited 2,142×
- Department of the Air Force v. RoseSupreme Court· 1976-04-21· cited 1,918×
- Safecard Services, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionD.C. Circuit· 1991-03-01· cited 1,840×
- Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldD.C. Circuit· 2006-01-10· cited 1,529×
- Military Audit Project, Felice D. Cohen, Morton H. Halperin v. William Casey, Director of Central IntelligenceD.C. Circuit· 1981-05-04· cited 1,309×
- United States Department of State v. RaySupreme Court· 1991-12-16· cited 755×
- Morley v. Central Intelligence AgencyD.C. Circuit· 2007-12-07· cited 720×
- Brayton v. Office of United States Trade RepresentativeD.C. Circuit· 2011-04-19· cited 711×
- Larson v. Department of StateD.C. Circuit· 2009-05-08· cited 703×
- Wolf v. Central Intelligence AgencyD.C. Circuit· 2007-01-16· cited 615×
- Cynthia King v. United States Department of JusticeD.C. Circuit· 1987-09-28· cited 587×
- Students Against Genocide v. Department of StateD.C. Circuit· 2001-08-07· cited 535×
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationD.C. Circuit· 2006-06-02· cited 532×
- American Civil Liberties Union v. United States Department of DefenseD.C. Circuit· 2011-01-18· cited 521×
- John Doe Agency v. John Doe Corp.Supreme Court· 1989-12-11· cited 519×
- Central Intelligence Agency v. SimsSupreme Court· 1985-04-16· cited 503×
- Alan L. Fitzgibbon v. Central Intelligence Agency Alan L. Fitzgibbon v. Central Intelligence AgencyD.C. Circuit· 1990-08-14· cited 423×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.