Skip to main content
· 12/18/2006

Lentz v. Eli Lilly and Co.

Citations

  • 464 F. Supp. 2d 35
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90767
  • 2006 WL 3704717

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining on a motion to transfer that only the second inquiry requires examination where it was undisputed that the action could have been brought in the transferee district
  • determining on a motion to transfer that only the second inquiry requires examination where it is undisputed that the action could have been brought in the transferee district
  • “[Expert witnesses] by virtue of their role as paid experts must be prepared to travel to testify and are compensated for doing so.... ”
  • “[The transferee district of] Maine has a greater interest than the District of Columbia in adjudicating the personal injury claims of Maine citizens under its own tort law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Huvelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.