· 12/18/2006
Lentz v. Eli Lilly and Co.
Citations
- 464 F. Supp. 2d 35
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90767
- 2006 WL 3704717
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining on a motion to transfer that only the second inquiry requires examination where it was undisputed that the action could have been brought in the transferee district
- determining on a motion to transfer that only the second inquiry requires examination where it is undisputed that the action could have been brought in the transferee district
- “[Expert witnesses] by virtue of their role as paid experts must be prepared to travel to testify and are compensated for doing so.... ”
- “[The transferee district of] Maine has a greater interest than the District of Columbia in adjudicating the personal injury claims of Maine citizens under its own tort law”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Huvelle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.