Skip to main content
· 6/19/2008

MacMunn v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Citations

  • 559 F. Supp. 2d 58
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46957
  • 2008 WL 2445490

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The District, while its contacts with the case are not ‘legally insignificant,’ ... does not derive as great an interest from those contacts as Massachusetts does from its interest in redressing the harms of its citizens.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ricardo M. Urbina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.