Ninth Circuit· 4/16/2012
Leigh v. Salazar
Citations
- 677 F.3d 892
- 2012 WL 1255043
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 7730
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that completion of a 2010 horse roundup did not render plaintiff’s preliminary injunction challenge moot because it could apply to future roundups
- explaining that “events subsequent to the filing of the case [that] resolve the parties’ dispute” render a case moot (citation omitted)
- recognizing First Amendment protection for “the press and public to observe government activities”
- calling for inquiry into history of public access to horse gathers, not to federal lands
- remanding for the district court to perform the Press-Enterprise II test
- “The government argues that the Press-Enterprise I framework is limited to attempts to access criminal trials. We disagree.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wallace, Noonan, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Courthouse News Service v. Michael PlanetNinth Circuit· 2014-04-07· cited 158×
- Index Newspapers LLC v. United States Marshals ServiceNinth Circuit· 2020-10-09· cited 94×
- Courthouse News Service v. Michael PlanetNinth Circuit· 2020-01-17· cited 74×
- Meyer v. Lepe (In Re Lepe)Ninth Circuit· 2012-05-09· cited 25×
- Adams v. Committee on Judicial Conduct & DisabilityN.D. California· 2016-02-25· cited 6×
- Leigh v. SalazarD. Nevada· 2013-07-19· cited 3×
- Oklahoma Observer v. PattonW.D. Oklahoma· 2014-12-19· cited 2×
- Guardian News & Media LLC v. RyanD. Arizona· 2016-12-21· cited 2×
- United States v. GilenoC.D. California· 2018-10-09· cited 2×
- Boardman v. InsleeW.D. Washington· 2019-01-10· cited 1×
- In re: Angel LepeNinth Circuit· 2012-05-09
- In re: Lisa Gay MellemNinth Circuit· 2021-02-22
- Courthouse News Serv. v. YamasakiC.D. California· 2018-05-09
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 2008-11-12· cited 11,986×
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court· 1987-06-01· cited 6,491×
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 2,202×
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1980-07-02· cited 1,951×
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court· 1984-01-18· cited 1,807×
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court· 1982-06-23· cited 1,561×
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court· 1986-06-30· cited 1,326×
- Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court· 1975-03-03· cited 1,289×
- Ashley Hunt Greenwood v. Federal Aviation AdministrationNinth Circuit· 1994-06-28· cited 961×
- Stormans, Inc. v. SeleckyNinth Circuit· 2009-10-28· cited 752×
- Sports Form, Inc., a Nevada Corporation v. United Press International, Inc., a Delaware CorporationNinth Circuit· 1982-08-27· cited 350×
- Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western NYSupreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 347×
- Stanley v. University of Southern CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 1994-01-06· cited 279×
- Lisa Martin v. International Olympic CommitteeNinth Circuit· 1984-07-16· cited 225×
- Klein v. City of San ClementeNinth Circuit· 2009-10-02· cited 204×
- Pitts v. Terrible Herbst, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2011-08-09· cited 188×
- United States v. Miami University Ohio State University, the Chronicle of Higher Education, InterveningSixth Circuit· 2002-06-27· cited 177×
- Brownfield v. City of YakimaNinth Circuit· 2010-07-27· cited 163×
- Mayhew v. WilderCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2001-01-11· cited 86×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1999-09-23· cited 80×
Other cases named Leigh v. Salazar
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.