Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 4/16/2012

Leigh v. Salazar

Citations

  • 677 F.3d 892
  • 2012 WL 1255043
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 7730

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that completion of a 2010 horse roundup did not render plaintiff’s preliminary injunction challenge moot because it could apply to future roundups
  • explaining that “events subsequent to the filing of the case [that] resolve the parties’ dispute” render a case moot (citation omitted)
  • recognizing First Amendment protection for “the press and public to observe government activities”
  • calling for inquiry into history of public access to horse gathers, not to federal lands
  • remanding for the district court to perform the Press-Enterprise II test
  • “The government argues that the Press-Enterprise I framework is limited to attempts to access criminal trials. We disagree.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallace, Noonan, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Leigh v. Salazar

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.