Skip to main content

Legassey v. Shulansky

Citations

  • 28 Conn. App. 653
  • 611 A.2d 930
  • 1992 Conn. App. LEXIS 320

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ‘‘Connecticut’s res judicata rules are derived from the theory of merger . . . set out in the Restatement (Second) of Judg- ments’’
  • “the dismissal of the first applications [to quash subpoenas] was a judgment on the merits, and, therefore, the plaintiffs’ second applications were barred by the doctrine of res judicata”
  • “We take judicial notice of the file ... and sua sponte hold that the plaintiffs’ applications to quash, that gave rise to this appeal, were barred by the doctrine of res judicata.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lavery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.