Connecticut Appellate Court· 8/18/1992
Legassey v. Shulansky
Citations
- 28 Conn. App. 653
- 611 A.2d 930
- 1992 Conn. App. LEXIS 320
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ‘‘Connecticut’s res judicata rules are derived from the theory of merger . . . set out in the Restatement (Second) of Judg- ments’’
- “the dismissal of the first applications [to quash subpoenas] was a judgment on the merits, and, therefore, the plaintiffs’ second applications were barred by the doctrine of res judicata”
- “We take judicial notice of the file ... and sua sponte hold that the plaintiffs’ applications to quash, that gave rise to this appeal, were barred by the doctrine of res judicata.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lavery
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Veronice A. Holt v. Kmi-Continental, Inc.Second Circuit· 1996-09-04· cited 349×
- Lighthouse Landings, Inc. v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-01-05· cited 65×
- Capers v. LeeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-11-26· cited 49×
- Somers v. ChanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-09-30· cited 42×
- Tirozzi v. Shelby InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-10-13· cited 37×
- Tanasi v. CitiMortgage, Inc.D. Connecticut· 2017-06-30· cited 35×
- Henriquez v. AllegreConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-02-19· cited 32×
- Honan v. DimyanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-06-12· cited 23×
- Tucker v. Pace Investments AssociatesConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-08-10· cited 17×
- Bruno v. GellerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-07-10· cited 16×
- Omotosho v. Freeman Investment & LoanD. Connecticut· 2016-03-09· cited 13×
- Cayer Enterprises, Inc. v. DiMasiConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-07-27· cited 7×
- NIPMUC PROPERTIES, LLC v. City of MeridenConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-08-23· cited 6×
- Barnett v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.D. Connecticut· 2012-09-28· cited 5×
- Barnett v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.D. Connecticut· 2013-09-09· cited 5×
- Barry v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF NEW BRITAINConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-12-27· cited 2×
- McNamara v. Saxe (In Re McNamara)D. Connecticut· 2002-07-25· cited 1×
- Larmel v. Metro North Commuter Railroad Co.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2020-10-06
- Tracey v. Miami Beach Assn.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2022-11-08
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Corey v. Avco-Lycoming DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1972-07-05· cited 186×
- Virgo v. LyonsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-12-27· cited 134×
- In Re Juvenile Appeal (83-De)Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-06-14· cited 133×
- Kennedy v. Bureau of Narcotics & Dangerous Drugs, United States Department of JusticeSupreme Court· 1973-01-08· cited 130×
- Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1952-07-29· cited 109×
- Orselet v. DeMatteoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-03-15· cited 99×
- McCarthy v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-26· cited 55×
- Gagne v. NortonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-01-11· cited 45×
- Vakalis v. KaganConnecticut Appellate Court· 1989-05-16· cited 21×
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-03-10· cited 19×
- Morgan v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-06-18· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.