Veronice A. Holt v. Kmi-Continental, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employee’s “disruptive” behavior and refusal to “take direction from her supervisors” were “legitimate reasons for firing [her]”
• holding that replacement evidence did not demonstrate pretext where ttie -. plaintiff merely “asserted] her. personal belief that she was fhe most qualified person for the -various positions”
• finding that a three-month extension of the plaintiff's probationary period did not qualify as an adverse employment action
• concluding that having superior 10 qualifications is a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason
• holding assertion of personal beliefs insufficient to show pretext
• explaining the standard in the context 21 of “sex or race” discrimination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).