Lee v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that eyewitness identification instructions \might be called for\ in certain circumstances, but need not be given where the strength of an identification was overwhelming
• instruction proper when contains none of the language condemned in Cage
• instruction proper when contains none of the language condemned in Cage
• instruction proper when contains none of the language condemned in Cage
• instruction permissible with \actual and substantial doubt\ language

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blockburger v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
• Whalen v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1980-04-16· cited 1,789×
• Cage v. Louisiana
  Supreme Court· 1990-11-13· cited 1,172×
• Lord v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1991-02-07· cited 109×
• Sparks v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1980-01-03· cited 16×