Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1/21/1958
Lee v. Lee
Citations
- 185 Pa. Super. 252
- 137 A.2d 827
- 1958 Pa. Super. LEXIS 779
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the conduct of the parties after separation is relevant for the purpose of shedding light upon their behavior prior to the separation
- holding that the conduct of the parties after separation is relevant for the purpose of shedding light upon their behavior prior to the separation
- holding that the conduct of the parties after separation is relevant for the purpose of shedding light upon their behavior prior to the separation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rhodes, Hirt, Gunther, Wright, Woodside, Ervin, Watkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jayne v. JayneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-07-20· cited 46×
- Evanuik v. University of PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-04-22· cited 21×
- S.M.C. v. W.P.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-04-24· cited 17×
- Shore v. ShoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1963-09-12· cited 2×
- Morgan Drive Away, Inc. v. P.U.C.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-07-31· cited 2×
- Smc v. WpcSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-04-24
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.