Skip to main content

Lee v. Lee

Citations

  • 185 Pa. Super. 252
  • 137 A.2d 827
  • 1958 Pa. Super. LEXIS 779

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the conduct of the parties after separation is relevant for the purpose of shedding light upon their behavior prior to the separation
  • holding that the conduct of the parties after separation is relevant for the purpose of shedding light upon their behavior prior to the separation
  • holding that the conduct of the parties after separation is relevant for the purpose of shedding light upon their behavior prior to the separation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rhodes, Hirt, Gunther, Wright, Woodside, Ervin, Watkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.