Skip to main content

Ledford v. State

Citations

  • 362 S.E.2d 133
  • 184 Ga. App. 556
  • 1987 Ga. App. LEXIS 2802

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that \the payee must give up something of value in reliance on the check in question\ (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • recognizing that “the payee must give up something of value in reliance on the check in question” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • holding that transaction was contemporaneous where something of value was given in reliance on delivery of check, even though check was delivered one day after goods were received
  • affirming the defendant's conviction for issuing a worthless check based upon evidence showing that the goods were given on April 17 and payment was made on April 18 because the exchange constituted a \single contemporaneous transaction\ (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • affirming the defendant’s conviction for issuing a worthless check based upon evidence showing that the goods were given on April 17 and payment was made on April 18 because the exchange constituted a “single contemporaneous transaction” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • defendant, acting on behalf of company, signed a check issued on a company account, which was returned due to insufficient funds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham, Banke, Carley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.