Brooks v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• knowledge that, because of insufficient funds, the check will not be honored is prima facie proof of intent to defraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Vadde v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-01-26· cited 21×
• Griffith v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1982-02-16· cited 13×
• Bowers v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1982-01-06· cited 13×
• Ledford v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1987-10-16· cited 8×
• BART
  Board of Immigration Appeals· 1992-07-01· cited 8×
• Galbreath v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-11-06· cited 7×
• Pittman v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-05-20· cited 6×
• Gilley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1987-04-06· cited 6×
• Hardeman v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-04-16· cited 5×
• Marchman v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-01-09· cited 3×
• Blackford v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
  S.D. Georgia· 1996-01-11· cited 2×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Hamilton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1968-12-02· cited 5×