Skip to main content

Ledesma v. State

Citations

  • 993 S.W.2d 361
  • 1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 3283
  • 1999 WL 253213

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a trial court must determine whether alternative courses of action are available and, if so, choose one that is less drastic than a mistrial
  • holding that a trial court must determine whether alternative courses of action are available and, if so, choose one that is less drastic than a mistrial
  • holding that a trial court must determine whether alternative courses of action are available and, if so, choose one that is less drastic than a mistrial
  • recognizing trial on the merits commences at the time the jury is impaneled and sworn
  • reviewing the trial court’s finding of manifest necessity for mistrial by applying an abuse of discretion standard
  • reviewing the trial court’s finding of manifest necessity for mistrial by applying an abuse of discretion standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cayce, Livingston, Holman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.