District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 7/16/1976
Lawson v. United States
Citations
- 360 A.2d 38
- 1976 D.C. App. LEXIS 331
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- police were told suspect was at a phone booth, wearing blue jeans, and had a grey beard
- “The report of an eyewitness is sufficient to provide the basis for further police investigation whether or not the witness is willing to identify himself’
- “The credibility of a paid or professional informer may be suspect, but in our opinion the same cannot be said of a citizen reporting a crime.”
- opportunity for investigation might well evaporate in the delay if police are prohibited from acting upon reports of crime, except where citizen eyewitness identified himself, or if he seeks out police cruiser or presents himself at precinct house to make report
- opportunity for investigation might well evaporate in the delay if police are prohibited from acting upon reports of crime, except where citizen eyewitness identified himself, or if he seeks out police cruiser or presents himself at precinct house to make report
- police arrived in less than three minutes
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nebeker, Yeagley, Mack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.