· 7/24/2008
Lawry v. Palm
Citations
- 192 P.3d 550
- 2008 Colo. App. LEXIS 1169
- 2008 WL 2837781
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting an appellate court may not substitute its conclusions for those of the trial court merely because there may be evidence supporting a different result
- constructive trust is an equitable remedy that can be imposed as a form of restitution to remedy unjust enrichment
- “The determination of which party prevailed for purposes of a fee-shifting agreement is committed to the trial court’s discretion.”
- “[W]hen a party claims it has incurred attorney fees as foreseeable damages arising from a [tort], such fees are considered special damages[.]”
- “[I]n a proper case, the trial court may rule that neither party prevailed and award no fees.”
- “By imposing a constructive trust, a court awards the successful plaintiff a personal order requiring the defendant to transfer specific property to the plaintiff.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Graham, Lichtenstein, Criswell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.