Skip to main content
· 7/24/2008

Lawry v. Palm

Citations

  • 192 P.3d 550
  • 2008 Colo. App. LEXIS 1169
  • 2008 WL 2837781

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting an appellate court may not substitute its conclusions for those of the trial court merely because there may be evidence supporting a different result
  • constructive trust is an equitable remedy that can be imposed as a form of restitution to remedy unjust enrichment
  • “The determination of which party prevailed for purposes of a fee-shifting agreement is committed to the trial court’s discretion.”
  • “[W]hen a party claims it has incurred attorney fees as foreseeable damages arising from a [tort], such fees are considered special damages[.]”
  • “[I]n a proper case, the trial court may rule that neither party prevailed and award no fees.”
  • “By imposing a constructive trust, a court awards the successful plaintiff a personal order requiring the defendant to transfer specific property to the plaintiff.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graham, Lichtenstein, Criswell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.