Lawrence Construction Co. v. Holmquist

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an oral settlement agreement was valid and the fact that “the parties contemplated subsequent execution of a written instrument as evidence of their agreement” did not prevent the oral agreement from binding the parries
• “If a written agreement is intended to memorialize an oral contract, a subsequent failure to execute the written document does not nullify the oral contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).