Skip to main content
· 5/7/2009

McKelvey v. Hamilton

Citations

  • 2009 UT App 126
  • 211 P.3d 390
  • 630 Utah Adv. Rep. 14
  • 2009 Utah App. LEXIS 125
  • 2009 WL 1231845

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting identical Utah Rule of Evidence 801 and rejecting argument that letter accepting offer was “inadmissible hearsay because proof of the existence of a contract is based entirely upon the letter’s truth,” because letter was non-hearsay act of contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bench, Orme, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.