LaVoie v. Power Auto, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \the adequacy of a warning ordinarily is a jury question\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• denying summary judgment based on a statutory modification affirmative defense where jurors could reasonably find that the seller failed to adequately warn of the danger of a foreseeable modification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Seeborg v. General Motors Corporation
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1978-12-29· cited 268×
• Findlay v. Copeland Lumber Company
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1973-04-26· cited 36×
• Benjamin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-12-26· cited 34×
• Moore v. Kaiser Permanente
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-05-18· cited 16×
• Marinelli v. Ford Motor Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-02-27· cited 16×
• Deberry v. Summers
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-02-06· cited 14×
• Stotler v. MTD Products, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-07-30· cited 12×
• Mason v. Mt. St. Joseph, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-03-04· cited 9×
• Piskorski v. Ron Tonkin Toyota, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-02-27· cited 6×
• Ensley Ex Rel. Estate of Ensley v. Strato-Lift, Inc.
  D. Oregon· 2001-02-15· cited 2×