Skip to main content
· 2/15/2001

Ensley Ex Rel. Estate of Ensley v. Strato-Lift, Inc.

Citations

  • 134 F. Supp. 2d 1191
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3308
  • 2001 WL 267693

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting plaintiff’s expert “states that the lift was dangerously defective when it left Strato-Lift’s hands”
  • applying Seeborg and denying summary judgment because issues of fact existed about whether modification caused the loss and whether product was unreasonably dangerous when it left the manufacturer’s hands

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hubel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.