Lau v. Arrow Financial Servs., LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the expert’s hourly rate presumptively reasonable and rejecting a flat fee that did not match that rate
• reducing a physician’s flat fee for depositions to his regular hourly billing rate
• finding $2,000.00 flat rate to be unreasonable and limiting compensation to hourly rate
• “[I]n general, ‘[a]n expert’s regular hourly rate for professional services is presumptively a reasonable rate for deposition.’”
• “[I]n general, ‘[a]n expert's regular hourly rate for professional services is presumptively a reasonable rate for deposition.’ ”
• “If [the expert] has to travel somewhere other than his office or residence for the deposition . . . he may also bill for his reasonable and necessary travel time.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).