Latz v. Latz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the D.C. Code “provides no substantive limitations on the Board’s authority to grant parole which would create a liberty interest”
• noting that only when “statutes or regulatory provisions are phrased in mandatory terms or explicitly create a presumption of release [will] courts find a liberty interest” to support a due process claim
• assessing the Montana parole system
• same under Montana parole statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).