Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 6/18/1997

Felton v. Felton

Citations

  • 79 Ohio St. 3d 34
  • 679 N.E.2d 672

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that pleading is not evidence so answer to petition for protection order cannot be used by court
  • holding that a witness’ eyewitness testimony, standing alone, may be sufficient to establish proof by a preponderance of the evidence
  • holding that since court considering a protection order is to proceed as in a normal civil action and since statute is silent on standard of proof, preponderance of evidence is the proper standard
  • holding that victim’s testimony alone was sufficient to meet preponderance-of-the-evidence standard and emphasizing that “[o]ften the only evidence of domestic violence is the testimony of the victim”
  • finding that a preponderance of the evidence standard is applied to issuance of protection orders
  • noting that a CPO “can be renewed at the end of the effective period”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Other cases named Felton v. Felton

10 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.