Supreme Court· 10/1/1990
Laroque v. Qantas Airways, Ltd.
Citations
- 498 U.S. 867
- 111 S. Ct. 183
- 112 L. Ed. 2d 146
- 59 U.S.L.W. 3249
- 1990 U.S. LEXIS 4576
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that there was no speedy trial violation where, among other things, defense counsel agreed to delays and continuances for purposes of plea negotiations
- provisions of the Speedy Trial Act embody a reasonableness standard for exclusion of time only when Congress explicitly required the period of delay to be reasonable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Other cases named Laroque v. Qantas Airways, Ltd.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.