United States v. Frank James Occhipinti, Jr., Austin Michael Suttles, Timothy James Spence, Tina Marie Swab

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a more thorough articulation would have been better, but concluding the findings were sufficient
• articulating the minimum explanation necessary for a district court to grant a continuance
• even though legal description of property contained a typographical-type error, no infirmity in warrant
• delay of 172 days insufficient to trigger Barker analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).