Skip to main content
· 11/17/1986

Largo Corp. v. Crespin

Citations

  • 727 P.2d 1098
  • 55 U.S.L.W. 2307
  • 1986 Colo. LEXIS 657

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding there is no relationship between the Dram Shop Act and the beer and liquor codes
  • rejecting common-law rule's proximate cause justification because proximate cause is a factual question for the jury except in the clearest cases susceptible to only a single inference
  • noting inter alia that “[a] criminal statute may be relied upon to establish negligence per se even though the statute is silent on the issue of civil liability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Erickson, Dubofsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.