Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 7/9/1980
Langworthy v. State
Citations
- 416 A.2d 1287
- 46 Md. App. 116
- 1980 Md. App. LEXIS 320
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that 33 month delay “is enough to trigger a speedy-trial analysis under the four factors set out in Barker v. Wingo”
- stating defendant hospitalized for fourteen months after initial incompetency determination, and court held jury trial after hospital reported him to have regained competency
- “This entire case rises or falls upon our consideration of the single factor of reason for the delay or fault.”
- “[O]nce an accused has been determined to be incompetent, the deferral of his trial pending a return to competency does not offend any right to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment.”
- “[O]nce an accused has been determined to be incompetent, the deferral of his trial pending a return to competency does not offend any right to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moylan, Melvin, Couch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-11-08· cited 19×
- Sangster v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1987-03-05· cited 14×
- Roy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1996-02-09· cited 7×
- In re Habeas Corpus by SnyderSupreme Court of Kansas· 2018-07-27· cited 6×
- Lurz v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-11-06
- State v. TopolskiSuperior Court of Delaware· 2023-02-07
- State v. Michael A. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Vermont· 2024-02-16
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1966-03-21· cited 3,039×
- Ollie Melvin Hodges v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1969-03-11· cited 128×
- Grayless v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-06-21· cited 84×
- Langworthy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-03-28· cited 58×
- Strawderman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-08-14· cited 57×
- State v. ViolettSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1961-11-07· cited 42×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-01-07· cited 42×
- State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Kansas· 1978-07-15· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. BrunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1969-06-27· cited 31×
- Ricon v. GarrisonFourth Circuit· 1975-05-28· cited 26×
- Germany v. HudspethTenth Circuit· 1954-01-14· cited 25×
- Baldwin v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1966-06-29· cited 25×
- White v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-02-02· cited 25×
- Colbert v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-08-15· cited 23×
- Hamilton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1961-05-08· cited 20×
- Coy D. Howard v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1958-12-10· cited 18×
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of Kansas· 1974-11-02· cited 16×
- Rozzell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-10-02· cited 16×
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1979-11-06· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.