Lane v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The interest of litigating parties and of the public in general in the finality of * Rule 6(b)(2) requires a party to demonstrate excusable. neglect when the motion is filed after the expiration of the original filing period. On the other hand, under rule 6(b)(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Johnson v. Carleton
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2001-01-19· cited 45×
• Gregory v. City of Calais
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2001-05-17· cited 30×
• Hutz v. Alden
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2011-03-03· cited 24×
• Caron v. City of Auburn
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1989-12-06· cited 20×
• Casco Bay Island Transit District v. Public Utilities Commission
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1987-07-07· cited 7×
• Department of Human Services v. Vining
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1992-12-08· cited 6×
• Lussier v. Oxford Development Associates
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1997-05-28· cited 5×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• S. John Chipser v. Kohlmeyer & Co., a Partnership, and Thomson & McKinnon Auchincloss Kohlmeyer, Inc., a Corporation
  Fifth Circuit· 1979-07-20· cited 94×
• Begin v. Jerry's Sunoco, Inc.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1981-10-15· cited 27×
• State v. One 1977 Blue Ford Pick-Up Truck
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1982-07-22· cited 22×
• Alfonso Meza, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
  Ninth Circuit· 1982-08-03· cited 16×
• Eaton v. LaFlamme
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1985-12-17· cited 9×
• Kirkpatrick v. City of Bangor
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1986-11-03· cited 8×
• Coleman v. Block
  D. North Dakota· 1984-09-17· cited 3×