Caron v. City of Auburn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• showing of excusable neglect required when motion for enlargement filed after expiration of time for filing appeal
• “Though the trial court was correct in its determination that SSA was a necessary party to the action, its dismissal on that basis contravenes the purpose of Rule 19(a).”
• avoiding repeated lawsuits is0in the public interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).