District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2/27/2004
Lane v. State
Citations
- 867 So. 2d 539
- 2004 WL 358112
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming where one element was undisputed and the omission of the other did not undermine the validity of the trial
- state must prove that the defendant knew or had reason to know that person the defendant resisted was merchant
- considering simultaneous verdict on related count in upholding conviction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Benton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rosen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-09-08· cited 13×
- Jenkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-11· cited 6×
- Polite v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-14· cited 2×
- Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-02-27· cited 2×
- Markus Leo Husarek v. the State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-06-18
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Castor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1978-12-19· cited 419×
- State v. DelvaSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-02-21· cited 308×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1960-11-16· cited 212×
- Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-12-19· cited 206×
- Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-12-04· cited 34×
- Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-02-27· cited 2×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-17· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.