Tamera Herrmann v. Cencom Cable Associates, Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We suggest that two claims are one for purposes of res judicata if they are based on the same, or nearly the same, factual allegations.”
• “[W]e suggest that two claims are one for purposes of res judicata if they are based on the same, or nearly the same, factual allegations.”
• “We suggest that two claims are one for purposes of res judicata if they are based on the same, or nearly the same, factual allegations.”
• “[W]e suggest that two claims are one for purposes of res judicata if they are based on the same, or nearly the same, factual allegations.”
• first quoting Parsons Steel, Inc. v. First Ala. Bank, 474 U.S. 518, 521 (1986); and then quoting Lane v. Peterson, 899 F.2d 737, 744 (8th Cir. 1990)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).