Skip to main content

Lane v. Oustalet

Citations

  • 873 So. 2d 92
  • 2004 WL 1066796

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “legal malpractice may be a violation of the standard of care . . . or the breach of a fiduciary duty”
  • “[W]hen the claim is for breach of the standard of conduct [i.e. breach of fiduciary duty], we conclude that lack of expert testimony should not preclude the issue from being heard by a jury.”
  • “The law of agency generally imputes knowledge and information received by an agent in conducting the 21 business of a principal to the principal, even where that knowledge or information is not communicated by the agent to the principal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: En Banc

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Lane v. Oustalet

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.