Skip to main content
· 4/30/1964

Farr v. Newman

Citations

  • 14 N.Y.2d 183
  • 199 N.E.2d 369
  • 4 A.L.R. 3d 215
  • 250 N.Y.S.2d 272
  • 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1185

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that, like Bazzle, “[t]he agreements were silent as to whether class-action arbitration was permissible. Accordingly, the question of whether these claims may be submitted to arbitration as a class action is for the arbitrator to decide”
  • compelling arbitration under employment contract and finding permissibility of class-action arbitration in face of contractual silence was “for the arbitrator to decide”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burke, Voorhis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.